A Buyer’s Guide to Zluri Alternatives: Choosing the Right SaaS Management Platform

The increasing adoption of SaaS tools by individual teams in today’s corporate scene forces many IT managers to grapple with a constantly expanding SaaS sprawl. As the SaaS stack grows, so do the risks: compliance gaps, security blind spots, and spiraling costs. This leaves IT managers chasing visibility, untangling redundant licenses, and trying to enforce policies that no one follows. Zluri platforms promise to organize SaaS chaos. They offer centralized SaaS discovery, usage insights, and automation. However, for many IT managers, the problem goes beyond just SaaS.

Zluri might work for some. However, it’s not always the ideal fit. This is especially true if you manage a complex mix of cloud-based SaaS apps. It also applies if you have a separate physical stack, like servers, endpoints, and devices (Mac, Windows, Linux). When your asset management needs stretch into ITAM, security, or procurement and require extensive integration, a plain SaaS management platform isn’t going to cut it.

This guide shows IT managers the best Zluri alternatives. It explains how to evaluate them. We also highlight platforms that excel in discovery, user lifecycle automation, security, and spend optimization.

But before we dive into that, let’s look at what Zluri brings to the table.

What Zluri offers: The SaaS Management Platform (SMP) baseline

Core Capability	Zluri’s Approach	How it helps IT Managers
Discovery	Deep discovery via SSO, finance tools, and browser extensions	Find all SaaS apps in use: Automatically uncovers apps your teams are using—even the ones they didn’t tell IT about—by scanning logins, expenses, and browser activity
User Lifecycle Automation	Onboarding/offboarding with playbooks tied to role changes	Easily onboard and offboard employees: Let’s you set up automated workflows to give new employees access to the right tools—and remove access when they leave or change roles.
License Management	Usage analytics to identify underused apps or over-licensing	Track who’s using what (and what’s going to waste): Shows you which apps are being used, by whom, and how often—so you can cut unused licenses and avoid paying for shelfware.
Security & Risk	Risk ratings, app permissions, and integrations with tools like Jamf	Catch risky apps before they become a problem: Flags tools with weak security, questionable permissions, or no known owner—plus integrates with tools like Jamf to take action on devices.
Renewal Workflows	Renewal alerts, vendor data, and cost optimization insights	Stay ahead of renewals and negotiate smarter: Sends alerts before renewals, shows historical spend, and helps you prepare for vendor negotiations with real usage data.

Benefits of Zluri SaaS management

1. Deep SaaS discovery: This tool automatically uncovers shadow IT using SSO, finance systems, browser extensions, and direct integrations. IT managers can quickly find unsanctioned tools or redundant apps without having to chase users or run manual audits.
2. Strong user lifecycle automation: Offers playbooks to automate onboarding, offboarding, and mid-lifecycle role changes across multiple SaaS apps. This helps reduce manual workload, speeds up employee provisioning, and minimizes security gaps when employees leave.
3. License optimization and cost savings: Provides granular usage analytics at the user level to spot underused licenses and duplicate subscriptions. IT and Finance teams can save real money by right-sizing SaaS licenses and cutting “zombie” apps.
4. Broad integration ecosystem: 800+ integrations with SaaS apps, SSO providers, MDMs, finance systems, and messaging tools (Slack/MS Teams), fitting into existing IT ecosystems without heavy lift or custom development. 

Despite its SaaS-focused benefits, Zluri may fall short due to the following reasons.

Drawbacks of Zluri SaaS management

1. SaaS-only focus creates operational gaps: Zluri only manages SaaS licenses. It ignores the hardware (laptops, phones, access devices) tied to those users and apps. In real-world offboarding, disabling a SaaS account isn’t enough. You also need to track down the laptop, wipe it, and close device compliance gaps. Without hardware-software linkage, you’re still stuck using spreadsheets or multiple tools, adding risk and manual effort.
2. No built-in IT Service Management (ITSM) workflows: Zluri doesn’t handle incidents, service requests, or ticket-based workflows natively. In mid-sized and enterprise IT environments, everything runs through structured service desks (e.g., Zendesk, Jira). Without seamless integration or native support, IT teams must juggle two disconnected systems, slowing down response times, increasing errors, and frustrating end users.
3. Weak procurement and financial governance: Zluri helps track renewals and costs. It doesn’t support full SaaS procurement workflows, including budget approvals, contract management, purchase orders, etc. When finance asks for audit trails or when you need budget pre-approval to renew a $50K SaaS tool, you’ll realize Zluri doesn’t go deep enough. This leads to manual back-and-forth between IT, Finance, and Legal, delaying renewals, losing discounts, or increasing compliance risks. 
4. Lacks strategic SaaS rationalization for business alignment: Zluri tells you what’s being used and what it costs, but it can’t tell you if the tool aligns with your business goals or capabilities. Enterprises often undergo digital transformation or consolidation. During these times, CIOs and IT directors must map SaaS apps. This links them to specific business units, outcomes, and strategic initiatives. Without that visibility, you might be flying blind, cutting costs without knowing the impact on business operations.
5. May not scale for complex, federated IT environments: Zluri seems to have been designed for centralized, mid-market IT teams, not for federated global operations with multiple subsidiaries, legal entities, and varying compliance standards. If you manage a tech stack across regions or subsidiaries, Zluri may struggle. It can have issues with multi-tenant management, role-based controls, or data residency. Enterprise IT needs more than surface-level SaaS tracking; it needs granular control and governance across different business units, which Zluri doesn’t yet provide.
6. Automation playbooks require significant setup effort: Zluri’s onboarding/offboarding automations are powerful, but they aren’t plug-and-play. Mid-sized to enterprise IT teams often deal with high volumes of onboarding, cross-boarding, reorgs, and mergers. If automation takes weeks to configure correctly per department or role, the platform becomes a burden instead of a timesaver. You may burn time and resources upfront just getting workflows usable.

Yes, Zluri excels at its automation-rich playbooks, especially for organizations with complex app ecosystems and decentralized SaaS usage. But, are they enough? Does it compromise ease-of-use? 

The review below states that Zluri, being in its infancy, still has a long way to go until it builds an SMP tool that completely eliminates manual tasks.

That’s your sign to consider other alternatives in the decision-making process as well.

Key questions to ask when evaluating Zluri alternatives

When you’re comparing options, what are some other factors you should look for?

1. Do we need better, more comprehensive hardware-software linkage?

You’re not just managing SaaS accounts, you’re managing laptops, mobile devices, security keys, and servers tied to users and apps. If an employee leaves, you must reclaim the laptop, revoke their SaaS licenses, and wipe the device. It isn’t just about shutting off software access. 

 → Choose a platform that connects devices to users and apps, so you can handle full lifecycle management (not just licenses).

2. Do we need deeper procurement or financial workflows?

Renewals can sneak up really fast and budget approvals take time. If you can’t see upcoming renewals, license costs, and utilization of licenses by vendors in one place, you risk renewing licensing contracts with vendors for software that no one is really using. Other times, it’s having to scramble across tools last-minute to justify spending to Finance.

→ Look for tools that help with purchase approvals, renewal alerts, cost tracking by reporting on custom metrics like SaaS spend by publisher, IT cost per department, etc.

3. How important is MDM, security, or user-level control?

Security isn’t just firewalls anymore. It extends to overseeing which apps your employees can install, what kind of data those apps access, and what happens to devices if a user goes rogue by ignoring company policies, etc. 

If an employee installs an unsanctioned app or loses a device, you need the ability to lock it down immediately.

→ Platforms with MDM integrations (like Jamf, Intune) and granular permission tracking can help enforce security policies across devices without chasing people manually.

4. Are we looking for HAM + SAM in one platform, or best-of-breed?

If your team is stretched thin on budget and manpower, stitching together five different platforms (one for SaaS, one for hardware, one for audits or financial management, etc.) can burn both valuable hours and money for you. 

Want one dashboard for everything i.e. hardware, software, users, and costs? You’ll want a unified ITAM platform with HAM and SAM capabilities plus integrations that enable user and financial management. 

If your team already has some specialized tools, for instance, a dedicated ITAM tool and a separate procurement software, then a best-of-breed SaaS-only tool could be enough.

→ Choose based on how centralized you want your IT operations to be, and how much overhead you’re willing to manage.

5. Do we prioritize usability or feature depth?

A software loaded with 500 features is useless if your team can’t figure out how to run a deprovisioning workflow in under 5 minutes. Ease of adoption directly impacts how effective a tool will be in managing your daily IT operations.

On the flip side, if you need complex reporting, layered security policies, or asset management down to the last serialized unit, you may need platforms with deeper functionalities.

 → Match the tool’s day-to-day usability to the skill level, size, and needs of your IT team.

Now that you know what to look for in a Zluri alternative, let’s look at some top options you can consider while making your decision to pick the SaaS management platform for your holistic IT needs. 

Top Zluri alternatives to consider

1. AssetSonar

AssetSonar is a unified IT asset management platform that combines SaaS Management, Software Asset Management (SAM), and Hardware Asset Management (HAM)—all in one system. 

Designed for mid-sized to enterprise IT teams that are managing a growing stack of hardware and software assets, AssetSonar helps manage the full lifecycle of both physical devices and digital software assets.  

It is also built for companies seeking audit-ready asset records. AssetSonar has an extensive customizable reporting feature that gives compliance confidence to IT, Security, Finance, and Procurement teams looking for a single source of truth for all their IT assets. 

Need centralized visibility, control, and compliance across your entire tech stack? Then AssetSonar is your go-to pick. 

From devices to licenses: What AssetSonar actually does

AssetSonar tracks all IT assets (SaaS, on-prem, and hardware) across their lifecycle by discovering them via its Agent and integrations (Intune, Jamf, SCCM). Furthermore, it links assets to employees and departments as cost centers, helps oversee license entitlements, and build compliance reports with audit-ready information on your tech landscape.

Let’s delve deeper into what it does!

• Hardware Asset Management (HAM): Tracks the full lifecycle of devices (laptops, servers, mobile phones, etc.) — from procurement and deployment to maintenance, custody, and disposal.
• Software Asset Management (SAM): Helps maintain software license compliance, monitors usage of on-prem software across endpoints, and ties licenses to users and devices to prevent over- or under-utilization.
• SaaS Management: Discovers cloud-based applications, monitors usage, optimizes license spend, and automates provisioning and deprovisioning of SaaS apps across teams and locations.
• Lifecycle automation: Can automate employee onboarding/offboarding, asset assignments, renewals, maintenance scheduling, and access control — all from a single dashboard.
• Audit and compliance readiness: Maintains a centralized asset repository with detailed history logs, usage records, and license contracts to support SOC 2, ISO 27001, and internal audits.
• Security and MDM integrations: Integrates with tools like Jamf, Intune, and Kandji to link device and app access, enforce policies, and enable remote actions like wipe, lock, or reset.

Real-world IT workflows powered by AssetSonar

AssetSonar isn’t just a place to store asset data, it’s where daily IT operations come together. From lifecycle automation to compliance preparation, it supports real-world tasks that mid-sized and enterprise IT teams handle every day.

Compliance and audit readiness

• A compliance-driven organization preparing for ISO 27001 or SOC 2 audits can pull unified reports for both software and hardware usage, cutting down prep time from weeks to hours.
• An IT director can generate a centralized audit trail for assets, licenses, and users across all departments without the need of slogging through spreadsheets.

Onboarding and offboarding

• IT can assign laptops, deploy approved SaaS apps, and provision access rights for remote employees from one system.
• On offboarding, an IT manager can automate the deprovisioning of SaaS access, revoke licenses, and track the return of physical devices, without having to toggle between disparate tools.

Procurement and spend optimization

• A procurement head can track software license costs and hardware depreciation in a single dashboard, aligning IT spend with budget goals.
• Plus, they can schedule alerts for expiring licenses and warranties ahead of renewal periods, making it easy to renegotiate contracts and retire any underused tools.

Security and risk mitigation

• The security team can identify unauthorized or high-risk apps installed on non-compliant devices and instantly lock or wipe those endpoints via integrations like Jamf.
• They can also maintain a map of device-to-user relationships, helping reduce the blast radius of security events or insider threats in case they occur.

Why IT teams choose AssetSonar over Zluri

When IT managers are looking beyond SaaS sprawl and need true end-to-end asset governance, AssetSonar fills the gaps that Zluri leaves behind, especially for organizations managing both physical and digital infrastructure.

Capability	The AssetSonar advantage	Why it matters
Full hardware and software lifecycle tracking	Tracks procurement, assignment, usage, service history, and disposal across both devices and software.	Zluri doesn’t handle hardware, leaving you with siloed views and extra tools to manage physical assets.
License entitlements and Contract metadata	Manages software contracts, license types, seat entitlements, and renewal terms.	IT and procurement teams get better renewal control and cost optimization, not just usage alerts.
Compliance-ready audit logs	Maintains complete change logs and usage history for assets, licenses, and users.	Essential for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and internal IT audits, without hunting across disconnected systems.
Unified agent and agentless discovery	Combines endpoint agents (e.g., SCCM, Intune) with agentless integrations (e.g., Okta, SSO) for complete visibility.	Captures both cloud activity and local installs, something that Zluri’s SaaS-only lens misses.
Hybrid IT coverage: SaaS and on-prem	Tracks cloud-based tools and on-premise software installations across desktops and servers.	Critical for hybrid IT environments where legacy systems still run key business functions.

Where AssetSonar may trail Zluri (for now) 

While AssetSonar offers broader lifecycle coverage, there are a couple of areas where Zluri edges ahead for teams focused purely on SaaS visibility.

1. No browser plugin for shadow IT detection: Zluri provides a browser extension that can detect unsanctioned SaaS tools based on user behavior in real time (e.g., signups or logins to new apps via Chrome). AssetSonar does not currently offer this feature, meaning it relies on IDP and endpoint integrations for app discovery which may miss user-initiated tools if they don’t pass through those systems. If your team’s biggest challenge is tracking every new SaaS tool being used without approval, Zluri may offer better visibility into “SaaS creep.”
2. Smaller native SaaS integration library: Zluri boasts 800+ native integrations with SaaS tools, including deep connectors for usage tracking, license actions, and auto-deprovisioning. Whereas, AssetSonar’s integration library is smaller. It covers core IT apps and focuses more heavily on infrastructure tools like SCCM, Intune, Jamf, Kandji, etc. rather than every niche SaaS vendor. If you need plug-and-play integrations with dozens of long-tail SaaS tools, Zluri may reduce setup effort. That being said, AssetSonar’s API and custom workflows can often bridge those gaps.

Read more AssetSonar reviews.

Why AssetSonar goes beyond Zluri for modern IT teams

Zluri is built for SaaS license tracking. AssetSonar is built for real-world IT environments, where assets move, people change roles, and audits are always around the corner.

It combines SaaS, on-prem software, and hardware management into one unified platform. You can track license entitlements, contract metadata, renewals, and compliance across your complete IT asset stack.

With both agent-based and agentless discovery, AssetSonar gives IT teams visibility into who owns what, where it’s deployed, and whether it’s compliant.

Unlike Zluri, which often requires pairing with tools like Snipe-IT or Lansweeper for hardware tracking, AssetSonar provides the complete picture, reducing tool sprawl, operational risk, and IT overhead.

2. Torii

Torii is a modern SaaS Management Platform designed for IT teams that want to automate SaaS operations without writing code. It specializes in lifecycle automation, helping IT manage app discovery, license optimization, and employee onboarding/offboarding from a centralized dashboard.

Torii discovers apps through SSO tools (like Okta), browser plugins, financial data, and direct APIs, bringing to surface shadow IT and unused apps. Its standout feature is a no-code workflow builder that enables IT and HR to automate tasks like provisioning apps for new hires, deprovisioning access during offboarding, or flagging underused licenses for action.

Focusing heavily on SaaS lifecycle automation and shadow IT detection, Torii is ideal for fast-growing mid-market companies that prioritize control and automation over hybrid infrastructure management.

What teams actually do with Torii

IT teams can use Torii to build no-code workflows that automatically revoke Slack, Zoom, Asana, and other app licenses when an employee leaves the company. This is typically triggered through an Okta deactivation, ensuring that access is removed instantly and without manual intervention, thereby reducing security risk and license waste.

HR departments integrate Torii with tools like BambooHR to trigger app provisioning workflows the moment a new hire’s start date hits. Based on the employee’s role or department, Torii automatically assigns them the right tools like Google Workspace, Notion, and Zoom, streamlining collaboration between HR and IT.

Finance teams rely on Torii to automatically notify app owners 30 days before contract renewals. These reminders can help stakeholders assess usage, reallocate or cancel underused licenses, and come better prepared for vendor negotiations, helping prevent auto-renewal waste.

Why it’s better than Zluri:
Zluri offers discovery and optimization, but lacks deep automation. Torii allows you to automate actions, not just surface insights. You can trigger Slack messages, revoke accounts, or reassign licenses via its workflow engine. It also has better integration with HRIS platforms and offers team-based SaaS ownership mapping — something Zluri doesn’t do.

Where Torii outpaces Zluri in workflow automation

Torii sets itself apart with a deeper focus on automation and cross-team orchestration, making it a better fit for IT teams aiming to minimize manual SaaS management.

Compared to Zluri, Torii offers the following benefits:

• Full no-code workflow automation: Builds onboarding/offboarding flows, schedules renewal alerts, and carries out license reviews without requiring a line of code.
• Auto-deprovisioning and access governance: Revoke access instantly based on SSO status changes, saving time and reducing risk.
• Stronger HR + finance integrations: Connect directly with tools like BambooHR and Expensify to bridge SaaS operations with employee data and spend.
• Usage-based license reclamation: Set logic to automatically downgrade or remove unused accounts, improving license efficiency.
• Department-level ownership mapping: Track who owns which apps across teams, so nothing falls through the cracks during renewals or offboarding.

Torii is built for teams that want hands-off SaaS governance, with smarter workflows and stronger alignment across IT, HR, and Finance.

Where Torii falls short compared to Zluri

While Torii excels at workflow automation, it may not meet the needs of IT teams managing a full-stack infrastructure or preparing for software audits.

• No hardware or on-premise asset management: Torii focuses solely on SaaS; there’s no support for tracking laptops, servers, or installed software, which limits visibility in hybrid IT environments.
• Lacks a dedicated SAM module: Torii does not offer features like license entitlement tracking, Effective License Position (ELP) analysis, or audit-ready reporting, making it a weaker choice for organizations under compliance pressure.
• Smaller integration library: With ~300 native integrations, Torii trails Zluri’s 800+ integrations, which may require more custom setup for teams using niche or long-tail SaaS tools.

Read more Torii reviews.

While Zluri surfaces usage metrics, Torii takes action, enabling automation to revoke or reassign licenses. Its lifecycle workflows give IT stronger operational control over license costs and usage.

If your IT responsibilities go beyond SaaS into hardware, on-prem software, or license compliance, Torii may leave critical gaps.

3. Zylo

Zylo is an enterprise-grade SaaS Spend Management and Vendor Governance platform built to help IT, finance, and procurement teams align around one goal: reducing SaaS waste and maximizing vendor value.

Zylo automatically discovers SaaS apps, tracks usage trends, centralizes contract metadata, monitors renewal dates, and provides industry SaaS spend benchmarks to guide smarter decisions. Unlike Zluri, Zylo takes a finance-first approach, focusing on vendor strategy, consolidation, and high-level spend optimization rather than operational workflows.

Focusing on enterprise SaaS portfolio governance, it is best suited for large, decentralized organizations looking to gain control over software budgets, negotiate better contracts, and report SaaS value at the executive level.

Zylo in action: Automating SaaS strategy across departments

Zylo isn’t just for IT. It empowers cross-functional teams to streamline SaaS operations, cut costs, and drive smarter decisions.

Zylo helps IT, Finance, and Procurement work from one SaaS source of truth, replacing ad hoc decision-making with automation and visibility.

A CIO can consolidate overlapping design tools like Figma, Canva, and Adobe XD used across marketing, product, and design teams—using usage data and departmental ownership to guide decisions.

Procurement can track upcoming renewals and contracts by syncing Torii with tools like Salesforce and Workday, ensuring no vendor deadlines slip through the cracks.

Finance can evaluate app-level ROI before greenlighting high-cost renewals — using Torii’s usage insights and ownership mapping to challenge spending that no longer delivers value.

Why it’s better than Zluri:
Zluri helps reduce license waste, but Zylo goes deeper with contract lifecycle visibility, financial planning tools, and app rationalization insights. Zylo lets you group apps by vendor, owner, and department to identify redundancies. For example, if multiple teams are using Lucidchart, Miro, and Whimsical, Zylo flags overlap and show spending per team; Zluri cannot.

Where Zylo outperforms Zluri for strategic SaaS governance

While Zluri focuses on SaaS discovery and license automation, Zylo brings a CFO-ready lens to the SaaS stack, helping enterprises take control of spend, vendors, and renewals at scale.

Compared to Zluri, Zylo offers the following benefits:

• Contract-level visibility with renewal workflows: Centralizes contract data and aligns renewal dates with stakeholder workflows, helping teams avoid surprise renewals or last-minute scrambles.
• Vendor rationalization dashboards: Visualize your app ecosystem by spend, category, and usage, making it easier to identify redundant tools and consolidate vendors.
• Finance-integrated spend forecasting: Build proactive SaaS budgets using real-time usage data and past trends, aligned with procurement and finance cycles.
• Executive-level benchmarking: Compare your SaaS spend and usage patterns against industry benchmarks to support smarter negotiations and strategic planning.
• Multi-app overlap detection: Spot functionally redundant apps (e.g., multiple project management or design tools) and quantify consolidation opportunities across departments.

Zylo is built for enterprises that need more than just operational control. It’s for those looking to align IT, Finance, and Procurement around long-term SaaS strategy.

Where Zylo may fall short for IT Operations teams

Zylo is a powerhouse for SaaS governance and spend visibility, but it leaves key operational gaps for IT teams managing day-to-day workflows. These include:

• Lack of automation features: Zylo doesn’t support auto-deprovisioning or SaaS access workflows, meaning IT still has to manually revoke licenses during offboarding.
• No hardware or SAM functionality: It doesn’t track physical devices, desktop-installed software, or entitlements—leaving gaps in hybrid IT environments or audit-heavy industries.
• No employee-level provisioning workflows: Zylo isn’t designed to trigger app assignments during onboarding or handle user-level automation across HR and IT tools.

Read more Zylo reviews.

Bottom line: Zylo is ideal for strategic portfolio management, but IT teams still need complementary tools to manage operational tasks like provisioning, deprovisioning, and compliance.

4. Productiv

Productiv is a tool that helps you see and manage all the SaaS apps your company is using, in one place. It gives you a clear picture of what apps are being used, who’s using them, and how much they cost.

With Productiv, you can spot unused or duplicate tools, so you’re not paying for software no one needs. You can also track how employees use apps, down to the feature level, to see what’s really adding value. You can also automate everyday tasks like renewing subscriptions, assigning licenses, and managing app access — no coding required. Plus, you can cut costs and reduce waste by right-sizing your licenses and getting rid of tools you don’t need.

Unlike tools that only focus on spending or security, Productiv gives you the full picture, helping IT, Finance, and Procurement work together to make smarter software decisions.

How teams use Productiv to control SaaS, spend, and strategy

Productiv isn’t just a visibility tool. Similar to Zylo, it’s a cross-functional platform that brings Procurement, IT, and Finance together around smarter SaaS management.

Procurement teams can use Productiv’s app-level usage and spend data to negotiate contracts with confidence, eliminate redundant tools, and manage renewals with long-term forecasting in mind.

IT departments can rely on Productiv to surface shadow IT, monitor license usage, and enforce compliance policies across sanctioned and unsanctioned applications.

Finance teams can get real-time visibility into SaaS spending trends, enabling them to track budget alignment, forecast expenses, and uncover cost-saving opportunities based on actual engagement, not assumptions.

Productiv enables a data-driven SaaS strategy, turning usage insights into action across the entire organization.

Why Productiv offers more than just SaaS discovery

Zluri is strong at uncovering apps and tracking licenses, but Productiv goes a level deeper, helping teams not just manage SaaS, but make smarter, more strategic decisions around it.

Compared to Zluri, Productiv excels in the following:

• Deeper engagement insights: Productiv tracks how employees actually use SaaS apps, down to specific features. This helps teams understand what’s truly valuable and eliminate what’s not. Zluri stops at app-level usage.
• Advanced, no-code automation: Productiv enables complex workflows for procurement, renewals, and app access, all built without writing code. It’s ideal for teams that want to save time while reducing manual errors.
• Data-driven SaaS strategy: Productiv blends usage, cost, and contract data into a unified view. This makes it easier for IT, Procurement, and Finance to align on renewals, consolidation, and budgeting, not just react to spend alerts.

If you’re looking to go beyond visibility and take strategic control of your SaaS ecosystem, Productiv delivers where Zluri leaves off.

What to keep in mind with Productiv

While Productiv offers powerful insights and automation, there are a few things IT and procurement teams should be aware of before diving in:

• Learning curve: Because Productiv is feature-rich, with advanced analytics and workflow automation, it can take some time for teams to get fully comfortable, especially if you’re transitioning from a simpler tool.
• Limited niche integrations: While Productiv integrates with most major SaaS platforms, support for highly specialized or industry-specific tools may be limited, so it’s worth confirming integration coverage during evaluation.
• Pricing transparency: Productiv doesn’t offer clear pricing tiers on its website. You’ll need to engage with sales to understand the full cost structure based on your usage, modules, and company size.

Some users have also reported data inaccuracy across different modules.

Read more Productiv reviews.

Bottom line: Productiv is a powerful platform for mature SaaS operations, just be prepared to invest time upfront and ask the right questions during your buying process.

5. BetterCloud

BetterCloud is a SaaSOps platform built for IT teams that need deep automation, access control, and security enforcement across their SaaS environment. Unlike spend-focused tools like Zluri, BetterCloud prioritizes policy enforcement, lifecycle automation, and data protection across applications like Google Workspace, Slack, Zoom, and Dropbox.

BetterCloud enables IT to automate complex user lifecycle tasks such as onboarding, offboarding, and mid-role transitions across multiple apps. You can enforce security policies by controlling file sharing, access levels, and permissions based on user role or activity. It allows you to build no-code automations that respond to user behavior (e.g., unauthorized file shares or app installs), reducing manual oversight. 

Plus, it has the ability to protect sensitive data with real-time monitoring and remediation capabilities. BetterCloud is perfect for IT teams. It secures and streamlines SaaS operations. Its focus is on automating control, not just tracking spend.

How BetterCloud helps IT automate control and reduce risk

BetterCloud empowers IT teams to automate repetitive tasks, enforce security policies, and reduce manual errors across the SaaS stack, especially in high-risk, high-change environments. 

IT managers can carry out the following workflows in BetterCloud:

• Auto-remove Slack or Zoom access when an employee is marked as “Terminated” in Workday, eliminating security gaps during offboarding.
• Alert IT instantly if sensitive or confidential documents are shared externally via Dropbox, enabling quick investigation or remediation.
• Automatically reassign ownership of Google Shared Drives during offboarding to ensure no data is lost or orphaned.
• Create role-based provisioning workflows. Use conditional logic (e.g., different app access for Sales vs. Engineering). This reduces manual setup and improves compliance.

BetterCloud helps IT teams stay in control, even when things move fast.

Why BetterCloud outperforms Zluri for access control and security automation

Zluri helps identify unused apps and licenses. BetterCloud offers more control. It empowers IT to enforce policies and automate offboarding. This helps reduce risk by controlling user actions within your SaaS apps.

What sets BetterCloud apart:

• Policy-based automation: Automate actions like revoking app access, reassigning assets, or notifying IT when risky behaviors are detected.
• Granular access control: Enforce role-based permissions and conditional logic across Google Workspace, Slack, Dropbox, and more.
• Security-first focus: Monitor file-sharing activity, detect data leaks, and audit user behavior to meet compliance and security goals.
• Integrated with your core stack: Seamlessly connects with Google, Microsoft 365, Okta, Dropbox, and other key collaboration tools.

Unlike Zluri, which surfaces usage data, BetterCloud acts on it, helping IT close the loop between insight and enforcement.

Where BetterCloud falls short for SaaS cost and vendor management

While BetterCloud excels at automation and access control, it’s not built for license optimization or vendor spend analysis. IT teams focused on financial efficiency may need a complementary tool.

It lags in the following cases:

• No license or spend analytics: BetterCloud doesn’t surface unused licenses, app overlap, or cost trends—areas where Zluri excels.
• No renewal tracking or vendor insights: It lacks tools for managing contract dates. You can’t benchmark pricing with it. It also can’t compare vendor performance over time.
• Not finance- or procurement-friendly: Built for IT security and automation, not budget forecasting or procurement planning.
• Requires deeper setup: Best suited for IT teams with a security-first mindset and the bandwidth to configure policy workflows.

Read more Bettercloud reviews.

If cutting SaaS costs or managing renewals is your top priority, BetterCloud might not be enough. You may need to pair it with a spend-focused platform like Zluri.

6. Snow Software/Flexera One

Snow is built for organizations where compliance, risk, and spend accuracy are non-negotiable. It empowers IT and procurement teams to stay in control of software usage across cloud, on-prem, and hybrid environments.

Snow helps enterprises turn complex license environments into actionable, audit-proof intelligence.

How enterprises use Snow to stay audit-ready and license-smart

Snow gives IT, SAM, and procurement teams the data and controls they need to manage software usage, compliance, and risk at scale—across cloud, desktop, and data center environments.

• Software managers can reconcile high-risk licenses like Oracle DB or Microsoft SQL to avoid overage fees and audit penalties.
• A CIO can build global dashboards to monitor software usage, costs, and compliance posture across business units or regions.
• SAM teams can prepare Effective License Position (ELP) reports to stay audit-ready and reduce financial exposure.
• During M&A activity, Procurement can use Snow to consolidate vendor contracts, validate entitlements, and streamline software portfolios.
• IT operations can monitor license consumption across the hybrid infrastructure to avoid shelfware and optimize true-ups.
• Security and compliance teams can rely on Snow to detect unauthorized software, assess vendor risk, and enforce policy across regions.

With Snow, large organizations can turn complex, hybrid software environments into clean, compliant, and cost-optimized ecosystems.

Why Snow outperforms Zluri for compliance and license governance

Zluri is great for optimizing SaaS spend, but Snow is built for enterprises navigating complex license landscapes and high-stakes audits. It provides the tools software managers need to reconcile entitlements, prove compliance, and protect against six- or seven-figure penalties from vendors like Oracle, Microsoft, and SAP.

Compared to Zluri, Snow:

• Tracks SaaS, desktop, virtualized, and datacenter software, not just cloud-based apps
• Generates Effective License Positions (ELPs) for audit defense and true-up forecasting
• Includes a built-in reconciliation engine to match entitlements with actual usage

For organizations that face regular audits, complex contracts, or vendor pressure, Snow offers the maturity and coverage that Zluri simply can’t match.

Where Snow may fall short for lean IT teams 

Snow is built for scale and audit defense, but that depth comes with added complexity and cost. For lean IT teams or mid-sized organizations, it may be more than what’s needed.

Snow comes with the following downsides:

• Complex setup: Snow’s deployment often requires specialized licensing knowledge and dedicated SAM expertise to configure and maintain effectively.
• Higher cost: Positioned for large enterprises, Snow comes with a premium price point that may be out of reach for smaller IT teams or SaaS-first companies.
• Limited SaaS discovery: Snow lacks real-time browser-based discovery, which Zluri uses to surface shadow apps created outside central IT control.

Read more Snow reviews.

Snow may excel at deep compliance, but it’s not lightweight or plug-and-play. Teams should be ready for an enterprise-level rollout.

7. JoSys

JoSys is built for lean IT teams that manage both devices and SaaS access in one place.

It helps growing organizations streamline employee onboarding, device assignments, and app provisioning from a single, user-friendly platform — without needing to manage multiple disconnected tools.

JoSys turns fragmented IT operations into efficient, centralized workflows.

How modern IT teams use JoSys to unify people, apps, and devices

JoSys gives IT teams end-to-end control over employee lifecycle workflows, bridging SaaS, hardware, and identity management in environments where speed, clarity, and simplicity matter most.

• IT managers assign laptops and SaaS apps (like Zoom, Notion, and Google Workspace) to new hires in one workflow, with zero scripting or manual handoffs.
• HR and IT collaborate via JoSys to ensure that offboarding triggers automatic license removal and device return coordination.
• Security teams can review and revoke access based on employment status or device activity, keeping data secure even in remote setups.
• Procurement gets real-time visibility into who owns what—software, devices, and entitlements—reducing unnecessary purchases.
• Ops teams consolidate IT toolsets by using JoSys instead of stitching together Snipe-IT, Okta workflows, and spreadsheets.

With JoSys, lean teams gain enterprise-grade control without enterprise-level complexity.

Why JoSys outperforms Zluri for unified IT operations

Zluri is strong at SaaS discovery and license insights. However, JoSys is purpose-built for teams managing the full IT stack — people, devices, and apps — with minimal overhead.

It combines SaaS access management with device tracking and HR-integrated workflows, eliminating the need to bolt on separate tools for hardware or identity management.

Compared to Zluri, JoSys:

• Supports both SaaS and hardware lifecycle management in one platform
• Automates employee onboarding/offboarding with no-code workflows tied to HR triggers
• Tracks device + app ownership at the user level, not just app usage
• Offers a more user-friendly, all-in-one experience for small to mid-sized IT teams

For fast-moving, lean IT teams, JoSys is a better fit than Zluri. It provides a unified system of record for employees, devices, and apps, which Zluri lacks.

Where JoSys may fall short for SaaS governance-focused teams

JoSys is built for simplicity and operational clarity, but it’s not a replacement for full-scale SaaS management or vendor analytics.

JoSys comes with the following trade-offs:

• No deep SaaS usage analytics or license optimization: JoSys doesn’t analyze app-level usage patterns or flag license waste across departments.
• Limited vendor and renewal management: JoSys doesn’t track SaaS contracts or help with renewal forecasting and benchmarking.
• Fewer SaaS integrations: With a smaller integration library than Zluri, teams may need workarounds for niche or long-tail SaaS tools.

Read more JoSys reviews.

JoSys is ideal for streamlined IT ops, but not built for finance teams focused on SaaS spend optimization or contract governance.

Final thoughts: Choosing the right Zluri alternative for your IT needs

There’s no one-size-fits-all SaaS Management Platform, and that’s exactly why exploring Zluri alternatives is so important.

Zluri has strong SaaS discovery and automation. But it falls short in some areas. These include hardware visibility, procurement governance, and audit readiness.As your IT operations grow more complex—spanning SaaS, on-prem software, hardware assets, compliance needs, and cross-functional workflows—you need a platform that matches your unique operational scope and priorities.

The best Zluri alternative depends on several factors. Consider how centralized your IT ecosystem is. Think about your main operational pain points. Finally, determine who owns SaaS across your organization—whether it’s IT, procurement, finance, or security.

Before you make a decision, revisit how each alternative ranks against the questions we outlined earlier in this guide:

Zluri Alternative	Hardware-software linkage	Procurement/Financial workflows	MDM/Security Controls	HAM + SAM integration	Usability vs Feature Depth
AssetSonar	High	Medium	High	High	Medium
Torii	Low	Medium	Medium	Low	High
Zylo	Low	High	Low	Low	Medium
Productiv	Low	High	Medium	Low	Medium
BetterCloud	Medium	Low	High	Low	Medium
Snow/Flexera	Medium	High	Medium	High	Low
JoSys	High	Low	Medium	Medium	High

Answer these, and you’ll be much closer to selecting the right SaaS management platform for the specific needs of your organization.