Asset Lifecycle vs. Asset Operations Management: How to Make the Shift as an Enterprise?

Enterprises have been focusing on simple two-dimensional asset tracking for many years. The goal here was to gather records of all existing assets, and maintain a log of all locations it was being used at. However, as a modern high-stake enterprise operations manager, you know that this goal is not enough. 

Consider a scenario where a high-budget sequence is ready to be filmed, and the crew is waiting for equipment. They’ve checked asset availability on the software and it says ‘On Site’. Surprisingly when they arrived on set, the camera lens was never returned by the previous shift. In such a situation, knowing where an asset is not going to be of much help. What actually matters here is that the requested asset is not ready for work. 

Why is static asset tracking lagging behind? 

Simple asset tracking takes inventory as a static item. It aligns records on the system where everything seems to be accounted for leaving out room for operational errors. In contrast, industries such as construction, engineering, and media production function on the principle of equipment being mission critical. According to EZO’s State of Asset Tracking Report 2026, 65% of equipment managers are tracking equipment, however still struggling from project delays. The reason? Operational discrepancies. 

At times, static asset records don’t always get updated for delays caused by human friction such as:

• Asset Movement: Equipment frequently changing hands across teams and sites.
• Shared Ownership: Assets that belong to a fleet rather than an individual, leading to “informal handoffs.”
• Disconnected Maintenance: Inspections that happen in a vacuum, rather than acting as a “gate” to ensure the next team gets a working tool.

Defining the two frameworks 

As your operations grow and become more complex, you find yourself dealing with hundreds of pending asset transfer requests, accountability gaps, and the rising pressure to improve ROI. Here is what you need to understand before making the shift: how your current lifecycle management differs from operations management:

Asset lifecycle management

This process is rooted in the basics of asset and equipment management. It treats equipment as a capital expense (CapEX) to be tracked from the moment of purchase to the moment of disposal. 

Focus: It centers around the administrative aspect of asset management, ensuring all assets are uploaded in the system, timely procured, and scheduled for maintenance whenever necessary. 

Goal: It’s built for long term ROI and depreciation management. Mainly answers questions such as “What is the total cost of ownership?” and “When does the depreciation schedule dictate we should replace our fleet?”

What it lacks? It slows you down in high-velocity environments where tracking movement becomes critical for operations. Based on a static model, it only caters to maintenance and deployment as checkboxes in a system. It fails to account for the operational friction that is an everyday problem in large enterprises. 

Asset operations management 

This process takes asset tracking from static to dynamic, delivering more control over movement, planning, and execution. It moves away from the linear timeline and instead powers a continuous, high-velocity Asset Operations Loop. 

Focus: Operations management just doesn’t track where an asset is or how much is left it monitors equipment as it moves through critical steps:

Plan → Request → Assign → Move → Use → Return → Restore → Review

Goal: It addresses the 3 main problems for an equipment manager: asset readiness, availability, and accountability. It shifts the focus from the front office to the field, answering the questions that keep Operations Managers awake at night: “Is the specialized gear ready for the 6:00 AM shift?” and “Who was the last person to touch this equipment before it broke?”

Differentiator: It is built on the principle that assets are no longer static records but constantly moving around to fulfill operational needs. While the system displays the storage warehouse an asset is supposed to be at, operations management enables you to ensure it reaches there without any friction. Its job is to ensure that through all that movement, the “operational loop” never breaks. 

A mission critical litmus test: Is your equipment holding you back? 

Making the shift to asset operations management is just a step in the right direction as you move up the enterprise ladder. To identify if you have outgrown simple asset tracking systems, identify the following patterns:

The cost of a downtime: In relatively smaller industries, a missing asset is nothing more than just an administrative headache. But in equipment-intensive operations it’s a work stoppage. A project lead calls you at 7 AM informing that the generator won’t start because of a missing specialized sensor. What ends up usually happening? Does the crew sit idle, causing the costs to skyrocket while they wait? This is common when equipment is the driving force behind revenue. In these situations, tracking locations in the database is not going to cut it. 

The movement frequency: Simple tracking systems work well when there is a 1-1 custody exchange. It struggles to keep up in many-many handoffs. As an equipment manager you find yourself overseeing complex handoffs as your tools move from the central hub to the site foreman, then subcontractor and finally to the maintenance tech. 

This is where you fall into the informal hand-off loop where equipment starts travelling without documentation through staff members that aren’t actually added on the system. If your software is not designed to cater to each, and every handoff then you’re likely to lose out on critical equipment. 

The readiness requirement: Work no longer just depends on ownership, it depends if it’s readily available to function. Knowing you own 50 trailers is a financial record. Whereas having knowledge that Trailer #42 has a fresh inspection, is fully stocked with consumables, and is currently hitched to Truck #9 is an operational reality. Check whether you find yourself constantly arranging for calibration, fuel top ups, kitting or safety inspections before an equipment is ready for use. If your crew is able to checkout equipment before these requirements are fulfilled then you have a gap in your system. 

If you answered yes to the above, then your organization has grown towards being an equipment-intensive org. From now, the lifecycle view needs to expand to include operational management. 

The asset operations loop: A better strategy for enterprises

The first stage for the shift is to recognize the need for tracking more than just serial numbers. It’s now reformed into a recurring series of work that needs to be supported by a robust operational loop. Here are the four main steps to follow to move to operations management as your main strategy:

1. Ensure readiness

As you hire more staff to deal with the growing org needs, you must have found yourself juggling with a lot of asset requests coming through email, text and slack messages. These problems weren’t that huge when you were a small company but now they can make or break your workflows. As a mid-market enterprise your focus is to remain demand ready at all times through proactive management. 

What to do?  Set up a system to manage asset requests coming in, track progress, address feedback and implement restrictions. Having a separate portal is a win-win both for admins and staff. Admins can track what types of requests are coming in while staff stays updated on the reserved gear. No more delays, or missed asset reservations and the work gets done on time. 

2. Track movement 

Location tracking is the first half of your asset management story. Now it’s time to stitch together location and custody tracking for  clear-cut visibility into operations. 

What to do? Make asset hand-offs a digital event. Every time Mike hands over the bulldozer to Alex, make sure this action is logged in under the custody section. GPS integrations and mobile-first tracking apps can be used to make it easy for employees to quickly log in custody transfer before they are lost in memory. 

How are you actually tracking assets across 200+ remote employees?
byu/dphunky inIntune

3. Master execution

Returned equipment might not be entered into the tracking system until ages later when it’s needed for another project. This lag in the workflows is silently eating your productivity with a visibility strain when the system does not show the accurate number of available assets.  

What to do? Use your tracking system to instantly record when and in what condition is the item returned. Instant execution of asset workflows keep you on top of accountability where items change hands hundreds of times a week.

4. Prioritize restoration 

Maintenance is usually a stand-alone department where assets are scheduled for repair based on the CMMS timeline. However, that doesn’t work for you any longer. For the larger asset operations, it’s important to note that a returned asset is not automatically available for work instantly. 

What to do? Club maintenance and asset tracking together to run more efficient workflows. Define automated workflows that reflect the status as the asset passes through the entire workflow. As soon as equipment is returned from the field, it should be scheduled for maintenance or inspection. Also add a review cycle to your workflow to investigate any recurring problems at the work-site. 

The hybrid power: Why combining maintenance, asset and inventory management is the future 

As an operations manager, your biggest frustration is not the lack of software but in reality too many different software being used for various things. Most enterprises are running multiple stacks: one for tracking maintenance, another for assets and a third for inventory. The future of your enterprise is not about finding a better solution, it’s combining these 3 critical aspects into one. 

Mission-critical equipment needs to be managed differently when you move up the market level. Here what a hybrid solution has to offer:

1.Tracking: engine of accountability and movement  

Moving past the passive ‘who has what’ phase you are ready for the operational shift. The new mechanism now focused on custody and asset flow both. By integrating tracking information into the wider system, you can find the current location via GPS, who had it last, its condition and when it’s needed next. No more ghost assets for you to worry about. 

At enterprise scale, tracking also becomes the foundation for lifecycle decisions. Not just accountability. Once custody and usage are captured consistently, you can stop guessing and start answering questions like:

• Which assets are truly utilized vs. sitting idle across sites?
• Which assets are “high-risk repeat offenders” for breakdowns after every third checkout?
• Which locations are over-checking-out assets without returning them through a clean process?
• Which asset classes should be standardized because they create fewer maintenance events and lower downtime?

This is where tracking shifts from “visibility” to operational control. As now every movement is tied to readiness, service history, and cost.

2. CMMS: the readiness gate 

Maintenance systems often run in silos telling you when a machine needs to be serviced or sent for inspection. But that’s it. Once the maintenance is completed, it needs to be assigned to the next project by the admin. That’s where your workflow breaks. With an integrated system, your assets flow smoothly from returned → maintenance → available. As a result, staff stops checking out broken or under maintenance assets to job-sites relieving you from putting out last-minute breakdown fires.   

This is also where lifecycle management becomes real, not a separate initiative, but the logic that makes your entire operating model reliable.

In an enterprise environment, maintenance is not just “fixing it when it breaks.” It’s the barrier that protects:

• Service readiness (assets go out only when they are actually safe and usable)
• Compliance and inspection discipline (calibration, safety checks, certifications, warranties)
• Downtime risk (preventive schedules, condition checks, and fast turnaround)
• Asset lifespan (you extend useful life by catching issues early, not by reacting late)

When CMMS is integrated into your asset and inventory system, readiness becomes an auto-state, not a human assumption. That means:

• If an asset is due for inspection, it can’t be mistakenly marked “available.”
• If it’s returned with damage, it automatically moves into the right maintenance workflow (repair, inspection, quarantine, retire).
• If recurring issues show up, you can flag the asset for deeper review instead of endlessly cycling it through jobs.
• If warranty applies, you can route the repair through the correct vendor path and retain the full service history.

3. Inventory: makes the work flow  

Expensive equipment, and heavy machinery are tracked diligently leaving behind consumables on an as per needed basis. That’s what needs to change. Any time a technician checks out a specialized kit, the system automatically prompts them to take the required consumables. When assets and inventory are linked together core spare parts are always available at site whenever needed. 

At the enterprise level, the main question you should be asking yourself is how does this make your work flow, rather than focusing on changing tools every now and then to accommodate a larger asset base. By putting together maintenance, inventory and asset management equipment managers can create an operational loop where every stage is inter-connected. 

Final call: Setting the operational loop for your enterprise 

Asset lifecycle management has been your go-to strategy for decades, but now you’ve grown above it. It is still a fundamental part of your management strategy but the horizon needs to widen to accommodate growing assets, and the team. If your projects are stalling it’s not because your depreciation schedule is wrong, but because your operational loop is broken. 

While making the switch, ask yourself the critical litmus test question: “Does our current strategy describe how work flows, or just what exists?”

If your system can tell you that you own a camera but can’t tell you if it’s currently being serviced after a sandy shoot, you are only managing ownership. If your system can tell you that you have 100 drills but can’t tell you who handed the last one to the subcontractor at Site B, you are only managing quantity.

An enterprise capable of managing flow has a higher chance of eliminating downtime. Ready to take the leap into full control over operations? Explore how EZO runs the loop, integrates your CMMS and inventory, and ensures your mission-critical gear is always ready for work.